For more than a year, Calcasieu Parish special education teacher Ganey Arsement has been on a self-appointed crusade against education reform in Louisiana. He has blasted charters, standardized testing, Common Core, teacher evaluation, and yours truly on his blog, as well as on social media. He has worked to coordinate his attacks with the state’s teachers unions, particularly the Louisiana Association of Educators, and has sought to ingratiate himself with anti-reform politicians like Gov. John Bel Edwards and former State Rep. Brett Geymann.
Arsement has also become an increasingly visible presence in Baton Rouge, where he has spent untold hours attending meetings of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) and lobbying in the hallways of the State Capitol. In recent months, Arsement has turned his guns on State Superintendent of Education John White – the bête noire of Louisiana’s reform opponents – whom he wants replaced. After failing to convince legislators that the law required them to reconfirm White (who has been on a month-to-month contract since the beginning of 2016), Arsement filed a petition in state court late last month that seeks to remove him from office.
Louisiana is ready for a new direction. https://t.co/eDLPMl5tEC
— Educate Louisiana (@edlouisiana) April 12, 2017
Through it all, Arsement has portrayed himself as a selfless defender of public education who is fighting the nefarious schemes of greedy “corporate” reformers. However, a closer examination reveals that his political adventures have instead come at the expense of students and taxpayers.
Unethical and possibly worse
Official attendance records provided to me by Calcasieu Parish Schools Superintendent Karl Bruchhaus show that Arsement missed 16.5 days of work – more than three weeks of school – over the course of the 2016-17 school year.
According to Bruchhaus, all but one of these days (May 9, 2017) were recorded as sick leave. State law permits teachers to take two days of personal leave per year without loss of pay. The law also allows teachers to take ten days of sick leave per year due to illness or other emergencies without loss of pay. Unused sick leave can be carried over from one year to the next.
In Arsement’s case, it is clear that he took paid sick leave on many days when he was actually playing politics in Baton Rouge. Moreover, you don’t have to take my word for it, as he admits as much several times on his blog. Here are just a few examples…
- Although he called out sick on February 23rd, he noted in a blog post that he actually went to Baton Rouge to attend the final meeting of the Governor’s ESSA Advisory Council;
- He took sick leave on March 29th, but again mentioned on his blog that he was in Baton Rouge at a BESE meeting;
- The same goes for May 18th (he also missed May 17th), when he was “sick” in Baton Rouge to introduce House Bill 536 with State Rep. Vincent Pierre, as he wrote in a blog post ironically titled, “HB-536: Who really puts children first?”
What this means is that Arsement was off doing political advocacy while his special needs students were left with a substitute (who also had to be paid) and taxpayers foot the bill. I would venture to guess that most people would find that unacceptable, especially the parents of his students.
Meet Mr. Arsement – @ganeyarsement – teacher at Barbe High School in Calcasieu Parish.
Check out why he ❤️'s his job…#thankalaeducator pic.twitter.com/VmfzVhuCyt— LAE (@LAEducators) November 16, 2016
Missing absences?
If that’s not bad enough, I’ve also identified at least one day – and possibly two days – where his attendance record says he was working, but he was actually in Baton Rouge.
Several sources have confirmed that Arsement was at the Capitol during school hours on May 2nd. Nevertheless, his attendance record does not mark him absent on that date. Why that absence is missing is unclear, but since teachers verify their timesheets, the error should have been corrected.
The second day in question is May 8th when, by his own admission, he proudly delivered a petition calling for the removal of John White to the office of Senate President John Alario. Although he does not indicate when he made that delivery, one assumes he didn’t hop in his car immediately when school ended at 3:10pm to drive two hours to Baton Rouge to drop it off. In any case, Arsement is not marked absent on May 8th, either.
Follow me! Join the fight. #SaveLaPublicEd pic.twitter.com/EPZSOFbNSQ
— Educate Louisiana (@edlouisiana) November 17, 2016
Exactly why reform is needed
When Arsement claims education reform supporters “demonize” teachers, what he means is that they actually expect teachers to do the work they’re paid to do. While this may seem draconian to someone who can apparently skip entire days of work and get away with it, this is not a radical concept to most of us. When taxpayers hand over their hard-earned money to pay for public education, they expect teachers to teach. When parents send their children off to school, they expect their kids will actually spend the day learning. When Arsement instead takes a bunch of sick days to lobby lawmakers for lower standards and less accountability, he’s breaking that social contract and possibly the law. Worst of all, he’s doing a tremendous disservice to the young people in his classroom – kids who need the most help.
In his effort to rollback Louisiana’s education reform policies, Arsement has inadvertently provided a real-life illustration of why they are so desperately needed. For that at least, I thank him.
Adding more nails in your coffin Peter?
Thanks!
Thank you for your hard work!!
Good on you, Pete.
Thanks – btw, I love your pic. 🙂
????
????????
My hometown and and embarrassment.
????
And when he IS at school, he’s posting on social media…
????
❤️
Cook working up a tasty juvenile lash-out meal. Call Ed Reform Now & they may buy the dessert since spending so much in NW LA on commercials
I’ll let @john_milkovich answer on my behalf: bit.ly/2t7Ffp6 #LaEd
And when he IS at work, he’s posting on social media! @CPSB_org @CPSB_CTE @Barbe_HS @laeducators #LaEd
Accountability goes both ways! MJ’s song, Man in the Mirror is fitting.
As for cost to taxpayer – Law provides that sick leave not taken the previous year can be reimbursed to employee upon request up to ten days at a rate no higher than $75 day. Whereas sick leave not taken will be reimbursed to the employee up to 25 days at the rate equal to the daily pay at time if retirement which is always higher, sometimes significantly, which is why many teachers choose to accumulate the full 25 days for payout at retirement. Those sick leave days are not additional costs to the taxpayers, they are part of the salary agreement that teachers were awarded to compensate, in part, for the low salaries teachers with professional licenses and degrees typically get. Now, as for Administrators, how about writing about some who have claimed (w no supervision) to have accummulated even years worth of “unused” sick leave for which they have been reimbursed per contract. http://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=79780
Pretty sad you’re desperately trying to defend this behavior. You’re missing the costs to taxpayers for substitutes as well as for the days he was marked present, but was actually in Baton Rouge. I don’t consider that part of the salary agreement.
I am not condoning anything as you imply. I am pointing out that the cost to taxpayer is lower when employees are absent and substitute paid ($35-$50 typically) than when sick days are reimbursed at retirement. It’s not part if a “salary agreement.” It’s law. I like to operate on facts. You indicated he was NOT marked present as per the records you provided. No teacher can be marked present when a substitute is engaged. This is no secret.