Connect with us

Louisiana

Who Are Mike Deshotels’ Defenders of Public Education? Pulling Back The Curtain On His Followers

Published

on

If you follow K-12 education in the Bayou State, you’re most likely familiar with Mike Deshotels, the former executive director of the Louisiana Association of Educators (LAE), who is one of most vociferous opponents of the state’s education reform policies.

Although Deshotels stepped down from his role at LAE years ago, he has continued to rail against everything from standardized testing to Common Core on his blog, Louisiana Educator, where he peddles conspiracy theories, speculation, and outright lies in an effort to malign state education officials and cast doubt on the progress Louisiana’s students have made over the past 10 years.

Deshotels has also launched what he calls his “Defenders of Public Education” project, a group of like-minded educators and activists who receive periodic email updates from Deshotels keeping them informed of his skewed view on various hot-topic education issues.

I recently uncovered a few emails from Deshotels’ “Defenders of Public Education” list through an unrelated public records request.1 The most recent of these emails is from October 17th of last year. In it, Deshotels tells his Defenders that “big business and out-of-state interests are attempting to buy our State Board of Education [sic] once again” and urges them to “tell the truth about these efforts to take away the rights of our citizens and taxpayers to run our public schools” in the lead-up to last fall’s elections.

What’s more interesting, however, is that Deshotels apparently doesn’t know how to use blind carbon copy on email. Therefore, the names and email addresses of all 458 members of his “Defenders of Public Education” group are listed for anyone to see. Needless to say, it’s an interesting assemblage of folks that includes:

  • Four members of the St. Tammany Parish School Board: Jack Loup, Mary Belissario, Neal Hennegan, and Charles Harrell
  • School board members from Washington, Jefferson Davis, Assumption, and Iberville parishes, as well as Bogalusa City Schools
  • 118 employees of Bossier Parish Schools
  • 74 employees of Lincoln Parish Schools
  • 26 employees of Ouachita Parish Schools
  • 14 employees of Union Parish Schools
  • Louisiana School Boards Association executive director Scott Richard
  • Louisiana Association of Educators president Debbie Meaux
  • Southern education professor James Taylor, Tulane political science professor Celeste Lay, and ULL geographer-cum-education activist Kathleen Espinoza
  • Education reform critics Karran Harper Royal and Lee Barrios

And, that’s just a fraction of the entire list. I’ve taken the names and affiliations of everyone on the Defenders of Public Education update from last October, stripped out the email addresses, and put them into a searchable format below.

Enjoy!


  1. Ironically, Deshotels has been engaged in a long-running dispute with State Superintendent John White over scores of public records requests that Deshotels has submitted to the Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) in recent years. 

Pete became involved in education reform as a 2002 Teach For America corps member in New Orleans Public Schools and has worked in various capacities at Teach For America, KIPP, TNTP, and the Recovery School District. As a consultant, he developed teacher evaluation systems and served as a strategic advisor to school district leaders in Cleveland, Nashville, Chattanooga, and Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. He now writes about education policy and politics and lives in New Orleans.

10 Comments

10
LEAVE A COMMENT

avatar
8 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Brigitte NielandGaney ArsementKeith LegerLee Barrios Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Brigitte Nieland

tag:facebook.com,2013:1772801353000820_liked_by_1013673191993733

Brigitte Nieland

https://www.facebook.com/100008129177637/posts/1772801353000820#liked-by-1013673191993733

Ganey Arsement

Gasp! It would’ve been more interesting if he had sent the email to YOUR followers.

Keith Leger

tag:facebook.com,2013:1175304672525925_liked_by_1003376223010049

Keith Leger

https://www.facebook.com/763006753755721/posts/1175304672525925#liked-by-1003376223010049

Lee Barrios

So what is your point? Mike’s blog is public and emails of most of his subscribers are public. Unless you were just promoting his blog why don’t you write about say his dispute on the test score scam. I would like to see your argument against his stats. Really, convince us he is wrong. Do they really pay you for writing this stuff?

Keith Leger

tag:facebook.com,2013:1772801353000820_liked_by_1003376223010049

Keith Leger

https://www.facebook.com/100008129177637/posts/1772801353000820#liked-by-1003376223010049

Citizen Stewart

tag:twitter.com,2013:780859338852139008_favorited_by_57768641

Citizen Stewart

https://twitter.com/petercook/status/780859338852139008#favorited-by-57768641

Citizen Stewart

Well, this is interesting. Another anti-reform groupthink cabal comprised of elected officials and paid activists. #SaveOurKids


twitter.com/petercook/stat…


Conrad Appel

Ed reform is to serve kids, not adults – remember La is 49th or so in educational outcomes in a country that is maybe 20th in the world


twitter.com/petercook/stat…


Louisiana

The Red River Ripoff Shreveport's AFT Affiliate Uses Bureaucratic Obstacles To Keep Dues Coming in

Published

on

Red River United (RRU), the American Federation of Teachers-affiliated union representing educators in Caddo, Bossier, and Red River Parishes, is using bureaucratic hurdles and subterfuge in an attempt to prevent members from leaving the organization.

A reader forwarded me a series of emails regarding three of the union’s current members who submitted a union drop request to Red River officials in October, indicating that they wished to end their affiliation with RRU and stop the monthly deduction of dues from their bank accounts.

The sign outside Red River United’s offices in Shreveport.

The receipt of those forms was acknowledged by the union. Nevertheless, when the three teachers checked with their banks at the end of the month, Red River United had once again deducted dues payments from their accounts. On November 1st, an email was sent to RRU officials notifying them of their mistake and requesting that the union refund those dues to the three individuals.

An emailed response from RRU’s in-house counsel, Elizabeth Gibson, flatly refused to refund those payments, explaining that the three teachers “executed a confidential agreement with Red River United (Membership Form), wherein the individuals authorized Red River United, or its designee, to draft their bank account each month for the amount indicated in the agreement for each billing period.”

She continued:

“Further, they acknowledged that they must give at least 30 days written notice to Red River United to cancel future automated debits. Red River United did not receive written notice at least 30 days in advance personally from the individuals indicating they had chosen to cancel their automated debits/membership. They must physically come to the offices of Red River United to cancel the bank draft due to the confidential nature of the information contained therein. These individuals have not done so. Accordingly, they are not entitled to a refund of the monies they authorized to be withdrawn from their bank accounts.”

Gibson added that the teachers needed to physically go to the union’s offices to provide a so-called “wet signature” in the presence of a Red River United employee in order to officially withdraw from the union and stop the monthly bank withdrawals.

Gibson’s emailed response in which she refused to refund dues to the three teachers.

A ridiculous (and dishonest?) response

Gibson’s response is not only ridiculous, but possibly dishonest. It’s also clearly an attempt by Red River United to make it as difficult as possible for current members to dropout of the union.

To start, the union’s “confidential agreement” – i.e., RRU’s membership form – isn’t all that confidential (in fact, I’ve included a copy of it at the bottom of this post). Nowhere on the membership form does it say anything about the requirement to provide a “wet signature” in the presence of an RRU employee to leave the union and stop monthly payments.

The small print from Red River United’s membership form.

Moreover, Gibson’s contention that the three teachers needed to physically go to RRU’s offices to cancel the bank drafts “due to the confidential nature of the information contained therein” is laughable. Anyone who has ever had a subscription to a newspaper or magazine can tell you that you don’t need to go to their offices to cancel it. Plus, there’s nothing “confidential” about the process. All Red River United needs to do is notify their bank to stop the monthly automatic withdrawals for those three individuals. End of story.

So why is Red River United trying to make these three teachers jump through bureaucratic hoops when they clearly don’t want to be part of their organization anymore? I suspect the union is trying to force them to come to their offices so they can pressure them to remain members, which is the kind of behavior you might expect from a dodgy timeshare broker, not a teachers union.

Nevertheless, teachers unions in other states have increasingly employed similar tactics to stem the departure of their members. For example, after Michigan became a right-to-work state in 2012, the Michigan Education Association (MEA) changed their opt-out policy to mandate that teachers withdrawal in August and force them to send their resignation requests to an obscure P.O. box address hidden on their website. The union subsequently refused to honor opt-out requests that were sent directly to MEA headquarters or were received outside of the month of August.

The United States Supreme Court is set to decide Janus v. AFSCME this spring.

I expect that we’ll see even more of these sort of schemes in the coming months. In September, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case which argues that requiring public employees to pay agency fees to unions (including teachers unions) is unconstitutional. It is widely expected that the Court will end up striking down the laws in the 22 states that currently mandate agency fees, meaning that teachers unions across the country will soon be scrambling to come up with ways to keep their members from dropping out.

Because Louisiana has long been a right-to-work state, the Janus case should have little direct impact here. At the same time, that’s exactly why Red River United’s efforts to make it as difficult as possible for members to leave their organization needs to be called out. Louisiana’s public school teachers have the right to join a union or not. Therefore, they should be able to leave a union just as easily as they signed up. If Red River United wants to salvage some of its integrity, it should immediately accept the resignation of the three educators in question and refund their dues as soon as possible.


Read Red River United’s membership form:

Continue Reading

Louisiana

AFT On The Bayou Union Spends Less In Louisiana, But More On Charter Organizing in New Orleans

Published

on

The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) spent less overall in Louisiana in the past fiscal year than it did in F.Y. 2016, but the union boosted its funding for charter school organizing efforts in New Orleans by more than forty percent.

An analysis of expenditure data from AFT’s 2017 annual report to U.S. Department of Labor shows that the union spent $2,326,573 in Louisiana during the fiscal year that ended June 30th, a slight decrease from the from $2.49 million it spent in the state in 2016.

About a quarter of AFT’s spending went to political activities, which included nearly $125,000 in payments to the political action committee of the Louisiana Federation of Teachers, as well as a $15,000 contribution to Defend Louisiana, a super PAC behind Foster Campbell’s unsuccessful bid for the U.S. Senate last fall. In addition, AFT spent nearly $370,000 to influence last year’s Orleans Parish School Board elections, as I exposed in a previous blog post in January.

A diagram showing the distribution of AFT’s F.Y. 2017 spending in Louisiana.

AFT also invested heavily in organizing activities across the Bayou State. It gave nearly $192,000 to Red River United to support recruitment in Bossier, Caddo, and Red River Parishes. AFT spent another $184,000 on organizing in Monroe and $147,000 in Jefferson Parish.

Furthermore, AFT’s most recent annual report suggests that the union is stepping up its efforts to organize charter schools in the Big Easy. In F.Y 2017, AFT national poured $412,926 into its New Orleans Charter Organizing Project, a significant increase from the $292,000 it allocated in 2016. In all, AFT spent more than $850,000 on its New Orleans-based activities in the past year.

Although their recruitment efforts in the city have had mixed success, AFT’s willingness to spend substantial sums of money in New Orleans makes clear they still pose a serious threat. Over the past four years, AFT has steered more than $1.6 million to organize New Orleans charter schools and roll back the city’s reforms.

We need to remain vigilant to ensure that never happens.


Explore the data:


Read AFT’s 2017 annual report:

Continue Reading

Twitter

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Subscribe to my RSS feed to get updates in your news reader. Follow

Twitter

Peter C. Cook
Peter C. Cook @petercook
New Orleans, Louisiana peterccook.com
Education Reformer • New Orleanian • Progressive • Democrat • Proud TFA alum • Check out my new side project: @retortonline
  • 28213 Tweets
  • 3134 Followers
  • 2901 Following

Facebook

Trending

Send this to a friend